Tuesday, December 21, 2010

DWI And Its Consequences

You are probably familiar with the acronyms DWI and DUI, as well as with their meanings, but how about OWI?

Acronyms that describe drivers operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs vary by case and state.

Originally, DWI referred to the term "driving while intoxicated." Later, when drug usage became an acknowledged factor, the term "driving under the influence" or DUI was coined. In Wisconsin, drunk driving charges are known as OWI, for "operating while under the influence," comparable to the DUI acronym used in other states. The modified definition for DWI now includes Driving While Under the Influence and  Driving While Intoxicated.

In my novel, For Every Action, a third-year law student (who is researching a case set for trial) raises the topic of DWI, driving while intoxicated. His DWI case involves an accident caused by a drunk driver whose passenger was injured during the crash.
 
THE STUDENT'S HYPOTHETICAL TRIAL CASE  

Scales of Justice
The attorneys representing the driver and his passenger become embroiled in an argument over who is to blame for the passenger's injuries. Common sense would seem to dictate that the driver is responsible for any injuries incurred due to his impaired driving. However, the driver's lawyer states that the passenger is partly to blame because he knew when he entered the vehicle that the driver was intoxicated and therefore made the personal choice to place himself in harms way.

This scenario creates an interesting debate: Comparative Negligence versus Assumption of Risk. But regardless who is to blame, everyone suffers the consequences.

DEALING IN FACTS

December has been designated National Drunk and Drugged Driving Prevention Month, a time to raise awareness about the consequences of driving under the influence of alcohol and drugs. For further information, click on the following link:



Thursday, December 9, 2010

Bougneit pics and Matriarch obituary



St. James Cemetery in Kenosha, Wisconsin





Bougneit home in Kenosha, Wisconsin

Obituary of Matriarch Zoe (Zelia) Cayo Bougniet





Gravestones of Bougneit Patriarch Florent and Matriarch Zoe Cayo (Zelia) along with son Herbert

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

FACT or FICTION?

Think back to the last movie you saw in a theater rather than on television or DVD. Was it a Bruce Willis action film, the latest Harry Potter movie, or do you go way back to Gone With The Wind?

The matinee price of a theater ticket in Honolulu is $8.50, a bit less for Seniors and Military. Snacks can cost even more. A kids special of buttered popcorn, small soda, and Junior Mints (with a foot-long hot dog covered in mustard, ketchup, relish, and jalapeno peppers on the side) will run you $9.00. (Choke money, yeah?) Cheaper to watch movies at home.

Last night, December 7, a date that FDR once declared would "live in infamy", I watched the 2001 remake of Pearl Harbor starring Ben Affleck, Josh Harnett, and Cuba Gooding Jr.

The previous evening I viewed the original movie, Tora! Tora! Tora!  Filmed in 1970, this version includes professional Japanese actors along with Martin Balsam, Joseph Cotten, E.G. Marshall, and Jason Robards. Though billed as a dramatization of the attack on Pearl Harbor, the format has the feel of a documentary.

Both movies portray the raw drama and tragedy of that fateful day. But the two films, separated by 30 years, explore distinctly different viewpoints of events surrounding December 7, 1941. What is fact, and what is fiction?

Our ingrained beliefs determine how we interpret information. It was once believed that the world was flat. Much was documented to validate this truth, until 17th century Galileo disproved the notion and was threatened with imprisonment for his heretical ideas. Or is it a fact that Yajnavalkya in the 9th-8th century BCE first suggested the earth was round?

Who first discovered America, Christopher Columbus in 1492 or the Chinese in 1421? In the practice of medicine, that which is accepted truth today may become less reputable tomorrow. You seldom hear of a doctor performing bloodletting these days, do you?

It's often difficult to separate fact from fiction in newspapers, magazines, or even novels. I researched multiple facets of the year 1968 before writing the novel, FOR EVERY ACTION. While I am confident the information I've included in the manuscript is accurate, an alternate interpretation of the facts could generate debate.

This became apparent when I "googled" the movie, Tora! Tora! Tora! and came across a site that listed 22 apparent flaws in the 1970 movie:  http://www.moviemistakes.com/film1314

As a reader and moviegoer, I try to keep in mind that novels and movies are meant to amuse, beguile, captivate, delight, enthrall, gratify, humor, inspire, please, regale, or stimulate. 

Hawaii Theater
Unless the facts are distorted to the detriment of the reader or viewer, I believe it is better to remember the melodic message of the 1953 song and the 1974 movie of the same name that starred the likes of Frank Sinatra, Elizabeth Taylor, Gene Kelly, Bing Crosby, and Liza Minnelli:  THAT'S ENTERTAINMENT!